Jump to content


My drivers manual says 91 RON petrol for my Camry, but the dealer suggested 95 RON. Which is better?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I've got the 4 cylinder Camry SL and the driver's manual said I can use 91 RON for my car. But I have been trying 95 RON. I'm finding 95 RON improves my fuel economy by 1 litre per 100 kilometres (according to the computer) compared to the time I used 91 RON. Am I wasting my money by using 95 RON? Although I have heard 91 RON petrol has more sulphur in it.

Thanks.


Posted

Hey mate up to you, 95 probably shall give you a smoother drive... can u afford it

Posted

+1 

 

 

from my testing a few years ago via fuel log,

i also went from 91 -> 95 with 100km, difference,

and when i switched to 98 i got 50km more.

Posted
5 hours ago, AlexeiN said:

Hey mate up to you, 95 probably shall give you a smoother drive... can u afford it

Yes, I can afford it. I’m filling up less often than I did in my previous car.


Posted (edited)

95 is supposedly cleaner/more refined than 91 as well as higher octane giving you the oomph missing when using 91 & improved economy.

@thisguy ps: do you have Hybrid or regular SL ? How do you find it? If Hybrid what's economy like ? cheers

Edited by ZZT86
Posted
5 minutes ago, ZZT86 said:

95 is supposedly cleaner/more refined than 91 as well as higher octane giving you the oomph missing when using 91 & improved economy.

@thisguy ps: do you have Hybrid or regular SL ? How do you find it? If Hybrid what's economy like ? cheers

I have the regular SL with 4 cylinders. 

At one stage I was considering a hybrid but I only average 16,000 kilometers per year. Admittedly that will likely go up slightly, now that I have a much nicer car, but I still couldn’t justify buying a hybrid with the low kilometers I do per year.

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

I would not use 91.
95 or 98 will be fine and will give you no problem except for maybe better performance and economy.
Lately I have been using E10 (94) in both our cars and they are running very nice on it, better than the 95/98 i had been using.
In the end.. it is up to you.  Try them all ...

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 6/28/2018 at 8:44 AM, jeffy said:

from my testing a few years ago via fuel log,

i also went from 91 -> 95 with 100km, difference,

and when i switched to 98 i got 50km more.

I have experienced very similar numbers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Join The Club

    Join the Toyota Owners Club and be part of the Community. It's FREE!

  • Latest Postings

    1. 1

      Turboed Corolla Overbuilt?

    2. 3

      Camry Touring 2010 Fuel consumption 15.2L/100km. Normal?

    3. 3

      Camry Touring 2010 Fuel consumption 15.2L/100km. Normal?

    4. 0

      Camry Touring 2010 A/C Issues.

    5. 6
    6. 18

      High idling on the 2zzge even when warm (solved!)

    7. 5

      High RPM Idle after the engine warm up.

    8. 0

      Tow bar

    9. 3

      Disconnecting winch, lightbar and UHF

    10. 0

      2011 Land Cruiser 1VD-FTV Engine Won't Start After Overhaul

×
×
  • Create New...

Forums


News


Membership