Jump to content

Martinj

Regular Member
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender*
    Not Telling
  • Toyota Model
    Camry Ateva

Contact Methods

  • First Name
    Mr

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Martinj's Achievements

Rising Star

Rising Star (9/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In
  • First Post

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Warning: this could be a pointless post, well at least to anyone without a sense of humour or an IQ above 95. Ready? Here goes. I told you it was pointless post.
  2. Martinj

    2012 Camry

    I tried out a 2012 Camry for size. Drivers legroom is less than gen 6 (by about 5cm) as is headroom (by about 1cm). Fixed rear seat headrests look super cheap. Alloy wheels look like something from 1988. Great driving car, but probably best to wait for the facelifted model late next year.
  3. The ride on your car must be harsh, to say the least. Do the 20" rims contribute to better handling than, say, 17" or this for looks only?
  4. Fit a rear lip spoiler, side skirts, mesh grill, 17" alloys, aluminium pedals, funny seats, and Sportivo badging. Oh wait, you actually wanted to go faster and not just look faster...
  5. Very high fuel consumption and/or faulty (?) fuel consumption trip computer readouts seems relatively common complaints with Camry. Anyone have experience with other cars to comment on whether this is a common affliction with other makes too? I bought the Camry intending it to be mechanically sound for at least 5 years, but probably 7-10 years.
  6. The gen 6 Camry gets six cylinder fuel economy at times, except on the highway where fuel consumption drops to around 7L/100km. I would not worry about the 12L/100km - that is what gen 6 does.
  7. What is it with this straight line 1980's styling? The alloy wheels on this new Aurion and the new Camry are circa 1988. I am not knocking Toyota and very possibly will end up buying an Aurion (or whatever the new model is called) in a few years time, but the styling (and I don't mind conservative styling) is really dated.
  8. Martinj

    2012 Camry

    Tokyo Freak, do you own a Lexus, Merc & Bentley?
  9. Martinj

    2012 Camry

    Correct. If it is real wood, then manufacturers often refer to the tree it is sourced from. For instance, everyone knows that Holden used to use blackbean in its top of the line Caprice. Open a BMW brochure and you can choose from myrtle, walnut, etc. Is fake wood literally wood? Look, I am not sure. I suppose it's like asking if a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound? No-one knows, because no-one can know. One can hypothesise, but never be able to collect empirical data to prove one way or the other.
  10. Martinj

    2012 Camry

    My understanding is that real wood was previously used (california walnut?), but promotional material for the new LS refers to woodgrain trim (the same terminology used in the industry for fake wood). I thought this was perhaps driven by an eco-friendly agenda.
  11. Martinj

    2012 Camry

    "Whilst that is true about the LS460, but you can't really say it's the same stuff as what's in the Camry lol" Yes, Lexus cultivates its fake woodgrain from a unique plantation of fake trees grown in the Japanese highlands. On the other hand, Toyota sources its fake woodgrain from a fictional forestry plantation in the Philippines.
  12. Martinj

    2012 Camry

    I would say $22k private sale. I reckon a dealer would list it for $25k, but knock the price down to $22k. New ones are available as runout for $30k driveaway, and the shape is ancient history.
  13. Martinj

    2012 Camry

    I don't mind fake woodgrain in Toyotas. The fake stuff in Fords & Holdens is the worst, as it is just painted on and literally rubs away to reveal white plastic over time. My current car has silver plastic, which is effectively fake aluminium. Even the Lexus LS460 uses fake (and not real) wood trim.
  14. Martinj

    2012 Camry

    Hilarious? Really? Re: building a bridge - I would propose that such a requirement completely unncessary. Discuss.
×
×
  • Create New...

Forums


News


Membership