CORZZA

They were cheap so i had to get them! I had others in mind but they were more pricey! Not sure of the offset. 40? i was told they are lows but some asay they super lows

to come back from last place he did well!

LOL! your a funny man jimmy!

2007 British Grand Prix - Race Results Pos Driver Team Gap 1 Räikkönen, Kimi Ferrari 2 Alonso, Fernando McLaren-Mercedes +2.4 3 Hamilton, Lewis McLaren-Mercedes +39.3 4 Kubica, Robert BMW Sauber +53.3 5 Massa, Felipe Ferrari +54.0 6 Heidfeld, Nick BMW Sauber +56.3 7 Kovalainen, Heikki Renault +1 lap 8 Fisichella, Giancarlo Renault +1 lap 9 Barrichello, Rubens Honda +1 lap 10 Button, Jenson Honda +1 lap 11 Coulthard, David Red Bull-Renault +1 lap 12 Rosberg, Nico Williams-Toyota +1 lap 13 Wurz, Alex Williams-Toyota +1 lap 14 Sato, Takuma Super Aguri-Honda +2 laps 15 Albers, Christijan Spyker-Ferrari +2 laps DNF Liuzzi, Vitantonio Toro Rosso-Ferrari DNF DNF Davidson, Anthony Super Aguri-Honda DNF DNF Trulli, Jarno Toyota DNF DNF Schumacher, Ralf Toyota DNF DNF Webber, Mark Red Bull-Renault DNF DNF Sutil, Adrian Spyker-Ferrari DNF DNF Speed, Scott Toro Rosso-Ferrari DNF

man this gets interesting! ^^^ 2007 British Grand Prix - Silverstone - Qualifying Pos Driver Nat Team Laps Time Gap To 1st 1. Lewis Hamilton GB McLaren-Mercedes 19 1:19.997 2. Kimi Räikkönen FIN Ferrari 18 1:20.099 0.102 0.102 3. Fernando Alonso E McLaren-Mercedes 18 1:20.147 0.048 0.150 4. Felipe Massa BR Ferrari 18 1:20.265 0.118 0.268 5. Robert Kubica PL BMW 22 1:20.401 0.136 0.404 6. Ralf Schumacher D Toyota 23 1:20.516 0.115 0.519 7. Heikki Kovalainen FIN Renault 24 1:20.721 0.205 0.724 8. Giancarlo Fisichella I Renault 24 1:20.775 0.054 0.778 9. Nick Heidfeld D BMW 17 1:20.894 0.119 0.897 10. Jarno Trulli I Toyota 24 1:21.240 0.346 1.243 11. Mark Webber AUS Red Bull-Renault 12 1:20.235 - 0.238 12. David Coulthard GB Red Bull-Renault 14 1:20.329 0.094 0.332 13. Alexander Wurz A Williams-Toyota 15 1:20.350 0.021 0.353 14. Rubens Barrichello BR Honda 12 1:20.364 0.014 0.367 15. Scott Speed USA Toro Rosso-Ferrari 12 1:20.515 0.151 0.518 16. Vitantonio Liuzzi I Toro Rosso-Ferrari 15 1:20.823 0.308 0.826 17. Nico Rosberg D Williams-Toyota 6 1:21.219 0.396 1.222 18. Jenson Button GB Honda 6 1:21.335 0.116 1.338 19. Anthony Davidson GB Super Aguri-Honda 5 1:21.448 0.113 1.451 20. Adrian Sutil D Spyker-Ferrari 8 1:22.019 0.571 2.022 21. Takuma Sato J Super Aguri-Honda 6 1:22.045 0.026 2.048 22. Christijan Albers NL Spyker-Ferrari 6 1:22.589 0.544 2.592

Kluger V6??

Got my 18X 7.5 with 225/40/R18 and no rubbing at all even with my kings in

im keen!!

Sunday the 1st? or 24th? Cos i was on james ruse this past sunday heading towards homebush sunday the 1st. u were accompanned by someone if that was you yeah that was i! Think i spotted Miss Sexy rolla on church street parra today? ? an in me???? if so well it definately wasnt me, im never near church st nor at parramatta lol. thats the second time somehere here has said they spotted me on church st????? how identical can this other car possibly be - surely it doesnt have a butterfly on the bonnet!!! :P Man i was sure it was you! I was a black rolla like yours, had rims like yours and she was flying possibly like you! :) Never looked for the butterfly. Its your Twin!!

nah mate the rant aint aimed @ u ....... if it was going to be aimed at u i wouldnt rant on the forum .... i would drive 2 ur place ..... pick u up ..... and drop u in the dumpster ...... and im sure jase will help me out if required :P :P :P :P :P :D :D :D :D :D hahaha! then id pick up that South african sausage and slap you fellas with it lol!! Pippy thanks for your imput on this matter! Ok im done with it now! :)

Sunday the 1st? or 24th? Cos i was on james ruse this past sunday heading towards homebush sunday the 1st. u were accompanned by someone if that was you yeah that was i! Think i spotted Miss Sexy rolla on church street parra today?

mate its called the noodle diet ...... and i guess to clarify a few assumptions that have been made because this has come up a few times ..... no i dont have a 2nd car ..... i actually went to work via the train/lift with mates/got dropped off when the car was being worked on ..... i was luck the old man was working 5-10 mins down the road ...... regarding the dollars all im gonna say again is none of it was simply handed 2 me ..... im talking 16 hour days for 2.5 yrs ..... the attitude that oh yeah "he can afford it" is absolute rubbish ..... if ppl really want something bad enough they will get off their ****s and make it happen ...... its a simple thing called "hard work" ...... i love how people "assume" that all people must be getting things handed to them on a silver plater because they also cant "simply" have it ...... well reality check ..... in most cases they arent ....... nothings for free in this world and the sooner people work out that the ordinary person must work 2 pave their way in life we can get rid of this "tall poppy" syndrome !!!!!!!!! [/end rant] Alright il give the noodle diet a go! :) I never assumed anything so i hope the rant wasnt aimed at me? I knew the car was your old mans cos you told me. but at least you had it for a while. You lucky you can get trains & busses to work. and i did say you saved up for the project. everything iv done to my cars in the past was out of my own back pocket. My days arent 16hours lol only 9 but 6 day weeks

Billy fair enough but im not saying that S/C is good because it gives great low down torque so that you can drive under 3000rpm but low down torque is there for acceleration stand still start, hill climbing etc. So it might help you get a head and possibly stay ahead. not everyone has a couple 1000 just to kick start the project. then its labour,ECU's and amounts of time tuning! You had a 2nd car to run around in and im sure the $$ saved up for the project. But im sure alot of them out there are saving up on the hush hush lol!

Why? The 2zz pair will a decent size turbo will **** all over a supercharged 2zz. The best i've seen in a lotus exige s makes 250hp atw @ 11psi. A average turboed 2zz will make that and more at 7psi. Turbo now days are efficient, and a correctly sized turbo will have very little lag. Only good thing about s/c is that it will always be on boost and make power. But the gains are minimal. 2zz with off the shelf s/c kit make around 220hp atw. In Aust dyno, that would be under 200hp atw. And hardly any room for improvement when you want more power. just face it for the 2zz S/C is a better option! and with the right tuning and stronger internals it will make far more than your claimed 250hp Where's the proof? Do you know what it takes for a s/c to make that much power on a 2zz with low comp piston? You will need to run far more boost than you would on a turbo. You would need a s/c that can handle that much speed and yet remain efficient. You would have to match a larger s/c to the 2zz which would mean more loss due to running the s/c off the crank. S/C isn't bad, but it's not the way to go when your looking for big hp. You tell me what your reasoning behind s/c 2zz being far more superior. Show me some proof. Keep in mind that usa dyno read 10-15% more than dyno dynamic dyno in aust. Well those are the dyno graphs iv seen. All im saying is that to me S/C is far better suited to the set up of a 2zz! The fact that the manufacturers favoured the S/C over the Turbo is one. 2zz's power is mainly top end. S/C will generate far greater torque lower down than a turbo will. And who said anything about the compression staying low? With a vortech charger you would be boosting around the same as you would with a turbo. With a Eaton charger you would have to boost alot more. @ Bill yes your 2zz runs very well on turbo setup. Maybe one day when i have the inspiration to S/C the stivo we can line up

Sunday the 1st? or 24th? Cos i was on james ruse this past sunday heading towards homebush

Why? The 2zz pair will a decent size turbo will **** all over a supercharged 2zz. The best i've seen in a lotus exige s makes 250hp atw @ 11psi. A average turboed 2zz will make that and more at 7psi. Turbo now days are efficient, and a correctly sized turbo will have very little lag. Only good thing about s/c is that it will always be on boost and make power. But the gains are minimal. 2zz with off the shelf s/c kit make around 220hp atw. In Aust dyno, that would be under 200hp atw. And hardly any room for improvement when you want more power. just face it for the 2zz S/C is a better option! and with the right tuning and stronger internals it will make far more than your claimed 250hp

and considering the M5 is a Saloon!

Kelleners BMW M5 vs Lamborghini Gallardo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQAmQEoXNkg Porsche 997 Turbo vs BMW M5 Kelleners Ferrari F430 vs BMW M5 Kelleners

Thanks mate! :)

100kws for a stock stivo?!?!?! Never man!

i still maintain the best forced induction setup for the 2ZZ is supercharging! Just look at the RunX compressor & Lotus that use the 2zz supercharged engine. There is also plenty of room to play with the ECU & charger on them!

would i be wrong in saying the average dyno reading for a stock stivo is around 112-115kw atw??

JHB is johannesburg. As well as Joburg, jozi, Egoli :) BRU15 shweet bro! Where abouts in joburg you from?

Ya boet iv been here 2 yrs in sept