First time posting here, but have been following the various comments on this issue for some time. Mine is a late 2011 Kluger. After taking delivery (on my drive home) I noticed noises. On day two after delivery, I went back to the dealer, and mentioned the intermittent noises and klunks in the front steering. Without taking it for a drive, the Service Manager said, “This Kluger has a new type of steering and you would not be used to it.” He also said “The noises are OPERATIONAL.” I can now say, an OPERATIONAL cover up and total BS! For me it has been a very long, frustrating and costly journey. I am a self employed small business owner and the down time from my work has cost more than what the car is worth. It has now only travelled about 12,000 k’s. By 9,200 k’s it was onto its 4th Intermediate Steering Shaft (original plus 3 replacements). The last being ‘the so called fix’. In my case, the ‘fix’ did not work. Intermittent noises and klunks are still apparent. It was noted at the last service (10,160 k's) the issue was still there. Vehicle was taken for a test drive, but due to the intermittent nature of the issues, they were not noticed during this road test. I drove down the coast last weekend and all still there. Will mention it again at the next service. Shaft History: At 1,600 k's shaft replaced Then at 7,500 k's another new shaft Then at 9,200 k's The 'so called' Fix! All along, Toyota continued to offer re-assurance, "The vehicle is safe to drive". Toyota have known about this issue for many years and continued to build and sell cars with these known faults. IMHO, they are totally irresponsible. There are plenty of old comments on the net about the issues, especially on USA forums. Apart from a recall, I think a refund would be in order to all those unsuspecting persons who purchased one of these faulty vehicles. Toyota should have advised the Dealer and the Dealer should have advised the Customer about the known fault. The Customer would have then been able to make an ‘informed decision’ whether or not to purchase a vehicle with a known fault. Toyota Customer Service and Toyota at Taren Point have been useless and at times arrogant and rude. Regardless of whether the vehicle is ‘in or out’ of warranty, any person that is being asked to make any type of payment or co-payment to replace this shaft is 'being shafted’, and should refer the matter to Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC). The fault did not just happen, it has been there all along. I think that there is enough evidence out there to prove the vehicles were built with a faulty shaft. Unfortunately there are no LEMON laws in Australia (that I am aware of) to cover faulty motor vehicles. In part, the ACCC Repair. Replace. Refund. brochure reads: "All goods must be of acceptable quality. This means they are: safelastinghave no faultslook acceptable, anddo all the things someone would normally expect them to do."The ACCC brochure/website also mentions a 'Major Problem'. That is, "An issue that would have stopped someone from buying the product or service if they'd known about it." If the selling Dealer had said, "John, over the next two years your new $55,000 Kluger will be off the road for about 30 days while we stuff around trying to fix its dodgy steering shaft." Would I have purchased the Kluger? I think not! More on ACCC website: http://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/consumer-rights-guarantees/repair-replace-refund#repair-replacement-or-refund As a 20 plus year owner of Toyota vehicles, I would never purchase another. Oh, what a feeling, NOT! John