I choose not to believe that statement for several reasons: 1) New Scientist is British, not American (my dad has been a loyal subscriber for over 10 years) 2) There is no "July 2010" edition, New Scientist is a weekly publication (see above) 3) You can search New Scientist articles on their website. No results come up for the above topic, especially not in July 2010 4) If they actually happened, the tests were conducted by the manufacturers, not an independent third party, thus results could be biased 5) The only increase to fuel feed you could see would be due to hydrostatic pressure....except that the hydrostatic pressure you'd get at the bottom of a 50cm-deep fuel tank (most tanks are flat these days) would be about 0.5PSI (water is about 0.433 psi/foot of height, petrol is about 0.75 relative density). Typical 4AGE fuel pump puts out about 75 psi, regulated at the rail to about 35psi. Thus, 0.5psi of hydrostatic pressure does **** all to a pump which produces almost 200% of required pressure.