Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted

only a '2' for "standard features" <_<

thats questionable... but i guess thats in comparison to the others...

Posted

surprised about the score for comfort and ergonomics. not really suited for large ppl.

good to see mitsu with best large car though. they really needed that.

Posted

How can they compare 2 door sports cars with 4 door sedans? I agree with most of the marks the Stivo received except for the one for standard features and think the performance mark could be a little higher.If you've driven a MX5 or a Mini you'll know why...


Posted

wow 4 for handling... not bad.

2 for space? cmon.. its a hatch, can't be that bad.

euro cars with their features (pfft)... like they ever use them all.

2 for performance? cmon are they serious... :angry: give one of the cheapest cars in the range a break. :D

overall, that's not a bad result...considering result was based against other cars.

Posted

Didn't do too bad for it's age compared to other newer cars.

2 for performance is ridiculous I reckon. Should have been 3.

Posted

Sounds like an odd category to me ... under $57K?

The number of different models and the sheer diversity of the whole thing leaves me speechless.

Compare the Stivo to a the Mazda6 MPS, for example, being in the same category ... equipment, space, they're just not comparable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Join The Club

    Join the Toyota Owners Club and be part of the Community. It's FREE!

  • Latest Postings

    1. 0

      Remote start

    2. 1

      1999 Camry Driver's door locking hatch issue

    3. 0

      Query about the correct rotors for 2006 ACV40 Camry.

    4. 9

      Android auto

    5. 9

      Android auto

    6. 1

      Turboed Corolla Overbuilt?

    7. 3

      Camry Touring 2010 Fuel consumption 15.2L/100km. Normal?

    8. 3

      Camry Touring 2010 Fuel consumption 15.2L/100km. Normal?

    9. 0

      Camry Touring 2010 A/C Issues.

×
×
  • Create New...

Forums


News


Membership