Hi everyone, just to give a bit of background, I was involved in a collision back in April with a guy in a Hertz rental car, which happened at a crossroads intersection - I was coming up towards the intersection behind another car (Car A) in front of me who was indicating his intention to turn right, and I too was also indicating to turn right. When Car A got to the middle of the intersection it started turning right and I too had started turning behind him. However, as soon as he started turning right, he swerved back into the left lane which caused a blindspot to both myself and another car from the incoming side of traffic (Car B ) which collided with me. In terms of road rules, I am at fault due to the fact that I am turning right and had to give way to the incoming traffic, regardless of the douchey move of Car A. However, I have received a request for reimbursement of the driver of Car B, who rented the car from Hertz but declined and therefore did not pay for any of the optional accident damage coverage and incurred an excess of $2xxx and is now trying to claim these additional expenses he incurred from me. I discussed this with my insurer, and they informed me that I am not legally liable to pay these additional costs (excess) that he incurred because this was a contract between him and Hertz. And that the only legal obligation I have is with Hertz and their car that was damaged in the collision. I discussed this with the other party driving Car B, and he says this is total Bull**** and that it's my fault because I hit him and almost killed him (think that was a full on exaggeration) so it's my responsibility to pay him for these costs. just wanted to know if anyone here knows from a legal standpoint as to whether I am liable to pay for his Accident Damages Excess and other related costs? He is saying that if I don't pay him, that he will take the matter to court. My insurer will be representing me in the first instance that he tries to get this money from me via legal avenues and will deny that AAMI or I am responsible for the costs. However, we believe that he may try come after me personally, if he loses in the first instance. I'm worried whether or not he would have a strong enough case to claim these costs against me. Thanks in advance.