Jump to content


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 988
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

come on evan....were waiting...i hope the silence isnt a bad thing.....didnt blow up did it ;)....will check back after lunch


Posted (edited)

this is gay ...car must have blown up ;)...lunch time check done....will drop back later in day

* evan it says your in the topic reading....stop the suspense and tell us the go :)

Edited by jaderd
Posted

just a quick slide back on into cyber space to see if evan has posted.....................noooooooooooo............sliding back out to reality and work :(

Posted

i don't think he will post it, there is no way it is accurate

Posted (edited)

so old mick knows eh...... there must be something accurate on the graph AFR atleast.....we all know dynos arent the most accurate things although a look at what he got would still be worth while.....its teething period anyway, from tune and different things im sure he will get it running how he wants and expects it should

* with micks post in mind i am guessing just it fell shy of the 100kw.....as under that he may be a little disappointed...

Edited by jaderd
Posted
so old mick knows eh...... there must be something accurate on the graph AFR atleast.....we all know dynos arent the most accurate things although a look at what he got would still be worth while.....its teething period anyway, from tune and different things im sure he will get it running how he wants and expects it should

* with micks post in mind i am guessing just it fell shy of the 100kw.....as under that he may be a little disappointed...

yeah ive seen the graphs... the AFR's look good, and the mani pressure is getting up around the 8psi mark... I wont reveal the power figures, thats up to Evan, but considering what they make stock, its physically impossible for the power figure to be correct.

Posted
so old mick knows eh...... there must be something accurate on the graph AFR atleast.....we all know dynos arent the most accurate things although a look at what he got would still be worth while.....its teething period anyway, from tune and different things im sure he will get it running how he wants and expects it should

* with micks post in mind i am guessing just it fell shy of the 100kw.....as under that he may be a little disappointed...

yeah ive seen the graphs... the AFR's look good, and the mani pressure is getting up around the 8psi mark... I wont reveal the power figures, thats up to Evan, but considering what they make stock, its physically impossible for the power figure to be correct.

whoa... so less than a stock 1zz.... so like 80kw. man.... that would be crushing!

Posted

Actually, it would be possible considering the blitz ECU has no control over the ignition timing at all, so the setup relies on the knock sensor retard of the stock ECU to keep it all under control...

When the ECU can't compensate for the rich AFR it detects and extra knock experienced, it pulls ALL the timing advance out, which kills topend power. The setup will still "feel" faster due to the torque from the boost, but it will be severely crippled in the top end.

This is why I commented that it was weird the blitz ECU doesn't do any ignition control at all.

Posted
Actually, it would be possible considering the blitz ECU has no control over the ignition timing at all, so the setup relies on the knock sensor retard of the stock ECU to keep it all under control...

When the ECU can't compensate for the rich AFR it detects and extra knock experienced, it pulls ALL the timing advance out, which kills topend power. The setup will still "feel" faster due to the torque from the boost, but it will be severely crippled in the top end.

This is why I commented that it was weird the blitz ECU doesn't do any ignition control at all.

hmm that makes sense.....

would you suggest aftermarket ECU is the only way to resolve the problem?

Posted

either a proper piggyback tuned in conjunction with OBD2 data monitoring or a full replacement ECU like PowerFC/Vipec etc.

I could probably plug in one of my spare Vipec's to the car with pippy's old charger map and Evan would crap himself at the massive difference in power :P

Posted

feels faster to sit in than what the power figures show. I am in agreeance with the virper or PFC though. Having the one unit to control the lot would have to be benificial.

Posted
Actually, it would be possible considering the blitz ECU has no control over the ignition timing at all, so the setup relies on the knock sensor retard of the stock ECU to keep it all under control...

When the ECU can't compensate for the rich AFR it detects and extra knock experienced, it pulls ALL the timing advance out, which kills topend power. The setup will still "feel" faster due to the torque from the boost, but it will be severely crippled in the top end.

This is why I commented that it was weird the blitz ECU doesn't do any ignition control at all.

that could be a possible reason too, but that said, with the s/c off it was WELL below stock... yes the SC would be a restriction in the intake, but not that big of one...

Posted

the supercharger lobes are a massive restriction to the intake, especially when you have hardly any plenum volume compared to stock.

Posted

Hey guys,

you are all probably wondering what it pulled... well, that is something that may never be announced :o

i am taking her to the track tomorrow, and keen to see what she will run...

if she runs close to a 15.1, then the Dyno power figures are wrong.

if im running a 16 or even 17 LOL :lol:

then the dyno is on the money...

if i can get a good time, i will be re-dynoing her, and get it done the RIGHT WAY!!!

Evo

Posted
if she runs close to a 15.1, then the Dyno power figures are wrong.

if im running a 16 or even 17 LOL :lol:

then the dyno is on the money...

if i can get a good time, i will be re-dynoing her, and get it done the RIGHT WAY!!!

Not necessarily. Remember Evan (and everyone else), this is your first time at the drags. Though possible, you aren't expected to pull your best time straight up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Join The Club

    Join the Toyota Owners Club and be part of the Community. It's FREE!

  • Latest Postings

    1. 9

      Android auto

    2. 9

      Android auto

    3. 1

      Turboed Corolla Overbuilt?

    4. 3

      Camry Touring 2010 Fuel consumption 15.2L/100km. Normal?

    5. 3

      Camry Touring 2010 Fuel consumption 15.2L/100km. Normal?

    6. 0

      Camry Touring 2010 A/C Issues.

    7. 18

      High idling on the 2zzge even when warm (solved!)

    8. 5

      High RPM Idle after the engine warm up.

    9. 0

      Tow bar

×
×
  • Create New...

Forums


News


Membership