Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted

That interior shot looks mint. Definitely wouldn't think Camry if that pic wasn't posted in this thread.

Posted

Yeah is looking really good, espcially the Modellista model :)


Posted

Agreed. Very nice.

It does look largely similar to the current Presara's interior so that's gotta be good :rolleyes: .

Black on wood looks noiiiiiice!

Posted

This is what I hate about so many modern day "driver assist" technologies. If the car was built right in the first place then most of these "aids" would become redundant.

And don't get me started on driver's who rely on these "aids"

I certainly agree

Hmm.... I kinda like the idea of ABS, VSC, TC, SRS etc being there in the background as backup in case I need extra help in an emergency situation.....

I mean you obviously don't RELY on these saving your ar$e, but it's good to have just in case.

I wouldn't want cars to be built like the holden kingswood where you got no modern driver assist technologies whatsoever. A person in one of those in a crash is like a soft boiled egg in a metal box that got dropped. The box may or may not have some damage, but if you look inside, what used to be an egg is now a gooey splattered, mangled mess.

Yeah, nah. Gimme all the gizmos and do-hickeys and driver assist technolomologies ya got! :clap: :P

Posted

This is what I hate about so many modern day "driver assist" technologies. If the car was built right in the first place then most of these "aids" would become redundant.

And don't get me started on driver's who rely on these "aids"

I certainly agree

Hmm.... I kinda like the idea of ABS, VSC, TC, SRS etc being there in the background as backup in case I need extra help in an emergency situation.....

I mean you obviously don't RELY on these saving your ar$e, but it's good to have just in case.

I wouldn't want cars to be built like the holden kingswood where you got no modern driver assist technologies whatsoever. A person in one of those in a crash is like a soft boiled egg in a metal box that got dropped. The box may or may not have some damage, but if you look inside, what used to be an egg is now a gooey splattered, mangled mess.

Yeah, nah. Gimme all the gizmos and do-hickeys and driver assist technolomologies ya got! :clap: :P

Then what happens to the skill of driving?

People will take corners faster then they usually would, thinking that this stuff is going to sort it out (or thinking that they are Lewis Hamilton) and save them... which it will.. 9 times out of 10.

Don't get me wrong though, they do help with the few people that put their car sideways after a light drizzle of rain but I certainly don't want to be driving next to that person who loses it that easily/pushes the car to lose it.

SRS isn't really an assist though is it? more of a necessity on all modern cars.

Posted

This is what I hate about so many modern day "driver assist" technologies. If the car was built right in the first place then most of these "aids" would become redundant.

And don't get me started on driver's who rely on these "aids"

I certainly agree

Hmm.... I kinda like the idea of ABS, VSC, TC, SRS etc being there in the background as backup in case I need extra help in an emergency situation.....

I mean you obviously don't RELY on these saving your ar$e, but it's good to have just in case.

I wouldn't want cars to be built like the holden kingswood where you got no modern driver assist technologies whatsoever. A person in one of those in a crash is like a soft boiled egg in a metal box that got dropped. The box may or may not have some damage, but if you look inside, what used to be an egg is now a gooey splattered, mangled mess.

Yeah, nah. Gimme all the gizmos and do-hickeys and driver assist technolomologies ya got! :clap: :P

Then what happens to the skill of driving?

Nothing, everybody on the road should learn how to drive properly. The point is, these are driving AIDS, not Autopilots. These technologies should be in place not so much to save the hoon driver who's being an absolute turkey on th roads, but the poor schmuck who's staring down the barrel of being a road fatality statistic through no fault of their own..

If the poor schmuck's vehicle has ABS, TC, VSC etc, he/she'd have a better chance (however slim it may be) of getting out of a situation that's going to get very very bad very very very quickly.

If driver assist technologies provides you with and extra few moments to regain control, I think it's something worth having.

Don't really care about the hoons who end up killing themselves. It's natural selection. We should all thank them for removing themselves from the collective gene pool so their stupidity cannot be passed on.

My 2.5 c worth, again, indexed for quarterly inflation figures released by the RBA.

BB

PS.

Last night I got stuck in a massive traffic jam on Roe Highway just past the South St offramp westbound. Eventually drove past a mangled wreck of what was once a Supra (I think). Roof was caved in, and what's left of the car was all twisted and decimated. Looked like the fireys also used the jaws of life. I think it was a single vehicle rollover. Definitely a fatality, in my opinion. Betcha excessive speed and possibly alcohol was involved. I laughed at the fact we've got one less of these oxygen thieves on the road. Didn't look like any other car was involved. Judging from the damage on the vehicle and how far the debris trail stretched, the git was definitely doing way way way over the speed limit. Race car driving EPIC FAIL. LOL :yahoo:

Posted

This is what I hate about so many modern day "driver assist" technologies. If the car was built right in the first place then most of these "aids" would become redundant.

And don't get me started on driver's who rely on these "aids"

I certainly agree

Hmm.... I kinda like the idea of ABS, VSC, TC, SRS etc being there in the background as backup in case I need extra help in an emergency situation.....

I mean you obviously don't RELY on these saving your ar$e, but it's good to have just in case.

I wouldn't want cars to be built like the holden kingswood where you got no modern driver assist technologies whatsoever. A person in one of those in a crash is like a soft boiled egg in a metal box that got dropped. The box may or may not have some damage, but if you look inside, what used to be an egg is now a gooey splattered, mangled mess.

Yeah, nah. Gimme all the gizmos and do-hickeys and driver assist technolomologies ya got! :clap: :P

Then what happens to the skill of driving?

Nothing, everybody on the road should learn how to drive properly. The point is, these are driving AIDS, not Autopilots. These technologies should be in place not so much to save the hoon driver who's being an absolute turkey on th roads, but the poor schmuck who's staring down the barrel of being a road fatality statistic through no fault of their own..

If the poor schmuck's vehicle has ABS, TC, VSC etc, he/she'd have a better chance (however slim it may be) of getting out of a situation that's going to get very very bad very very very quickly.

Thats a good point. I had in my head that my sister has a subaru liberty that has traction control..... 2.5L 4Cyl all wheel drive that has traction control.. Its those sort of decisions that make me shake my head... so I turn it off everytime i drive it.

I would turn it off in the Aurion more if I didn't have to do the brake pumping action

Posted (edited)

Here is New Aurion 2012, I accidentally found this link on web

http://www.caradvice.com.au/134842/2012-toyota-aurion-revealed-on-sale-in-australia-q1/

the specs are:

3.5-litre V6 petrol engine produces 204kW of power and 346Nm of torque up 4kW/10Nm from 200kW and 336Nm. The six-speed automatic transmission from the current model carries over into the 2012 model.

from my honest opinion I didn't feel much impressed on the new model, they only changed a bit shape and added more AIR BAGS (total 10x) maybe some small things anyway good luck with new Aurion

Edited by Peter Yeh
Posted

Peter Yeh: Merged your post with the already open topic.

Posted

Thanks ToyotaFreak for the pictures.

I hope the rear looks better than that in real life or it seems Toyota is heading the way of Suburu in that their whole range looks stupid.

Posted

Still not 100% a fan of the interior. Definitely appears higher quality, but gives me an opinion of belonging to the inside of a Japanese 4x4 - steering wheel is definitely a turn off.

Increase power, fuel economy and less weight is all good, but the differences are very slight and I doubt would make any real world difference between the face lift and previous models. Might be around 0.1 quicker down the 1/4 IMO.

Posted

Still not 100% a fan of the interior. Definitely appears higher quality, but gives me an opinion of belonging to the inside of a Japanese 4x4 - steering wheel is definitely a turn off.

Increase power, fuel economy and less weight is all good, but the differences are very slight and I doubt would make any real world difference between the face lift and previous models. Might be around 0.1 quicker down the 1/4 IMO.

More importantly, there's STILL not enough cupholders! :P

Posted

:o

+1 to that!

I wonder if that's the sportivo? If so that's looking really good at the front. Still killing to know what the aussie line up of Aurions will look like!

Posted

It doesn't look very sportivoey, except for the lip spoiler?

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

'Sports' ?

post-1206-0-58921100-1319080459_thumb.jp

post-1206-0-42981700-1319080472_thumb.jp

Edited by u54mot
Posted

The front reminds me of the current Camry Sportivo mashed up with the Aurion Sportivo.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Chinese/ South East Asian Camry A.K.A Aurion launched in China. Available in three models; Camry (2.0G/ 2.5G/ 2.5VN/ 2.5Q), Camry SE (2.0S/2.5S) & Camry Hybrid (Flagship)

Will be interesting to see what Australia's Aurion Sportivo will look like (Either a slightly modified SE bumper, or something unique for Australia.).

9-4-42-2-643224243.jpg

u_201111090352072343736.jpg

u_201111090352214773736.jpg

u_201111090352156583736.jpg

u_201111090351077983736.jpg

Sources:

http://www.autohome.com.cn/advice/201111/262023.html

http://auto.sina.com.cn/z/camry7launch/index.shtml

http://auto.sohu.com/s2011/allnewcamrylaunch/index.shtml

Posted

I wen't to a market research on Aurions in Sydney and I believe we are getting the HEV model out here not the SE model for the ATX, Prodigy, Presara types and a custom body kit for the Sportivo.

I saw the beta version of the Sportivo and it looks like trash, It had black plastic everywhere and looked like a bolt on cheap body kit. I hope the negative feedback was taken in. None of the pictures I have seen here are anything like what I saw.

The same muffler inside a muffler is making a comeback......

u_201111090352072343736.jpg

Posted

So.. Aurion looks pretty much similar to Lexus GS..

And now, the new ones comes down from an LS n Accord? :huh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Join The Club

    Join the Toyota Owners Club and be part of the Community. It's FREE!

  • Latest Postings

    1. 0

      E160 Corolla fielder suspension

    2. 0

      Remote start

    3. 1

      1999 Camry Driver's door locking hatch issue

    4. 0

      Query about the correct rotors for 2006 ACV40 Camry.

    5. 9

      Android auto

    6. 9

      Android auto

    7. 1

      Turboed Corolla Overbuilt?

    8. 3

      Camry Touring 2010 Fuel consumption 15.2L/100km. Normal?

    9. 3

      Camry Touring 2010 Fuel consumption 15.2L/100km. Normal?

    10. 0

      Camry Touring 2010 A/C Issues.

×
×
  • Create New...

Forums


News


Membership